Re: Is there a more comprehensive Old Persian lexicon than R.G. Kent's?

>Is it possible that someone simply transliterated an English message
>into OPers cuneiform, and the gimmick was simply to get you to identify
>the script and then read it?

Unfortunately, that was the first thing I tried, with no luck.

>And did you rule out Ugaritic? Some of the letters are similar in the
>two scripts.

'Fraid it definitely isn't Ugaritic.

Interestingly, it contains one symbol, sort of like a "K", which looks
like Old Persian but isn't. I'm not sure whether to treat it as a K, a
null, or an indicator of a fake message.
.