Re: The Myth of Arbitrariness


benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Do you really think that, by some form of research, we might some day
> arrive at an explanation for _why_ the word for dog is "dog", "chien",
> "perro", "hund", "inu", "kurii", "sobaka", etc. in various languages?
> (I mean, of course, something _other_ than the etymological/historical
> particulars of each language.) I can't even imagine what such an
> explanation might look like.
>
> Everyone will admit that arbitrariness is not total, that there are
> some non-arbitrary elements in language. John Lawler is probably right
> in emphasizing that these are more extensive than many people think.
> But arbitrariness is still the typical situation.
>
> Even within the familiar domains of non-arbitrary, sound-symbolizing
> words, arbitrariness exists. According to my little dictionary, the
> crow is called /qa:q/ in Egyptian Arabic. We can see the similarity to
> the crow's voice, and thus a sound-meaning connection. In English there
> is no such connection -- even though the bird may say "caw caw", its
> name is /kro:/, and that's an arbitrary fact about English. But even in
> Arabic, while the imitative origins of the name may be obvious, it is
> an arbitrary fact that must be learned that the bird _is_ named in this
> particular way, and not another -- not */ka:k/ or */qa:qa:/ or anything
> else. And that's an arbitrary fact about Arabic.

The Myth or the Dilemma of Arbitrariness was developed because human
language was (has been) seen as a purely linguistic phenomenon. But The
Language phenomenon which is unique to human beings cannot only be seen
as a linguistic skill. All of those linguistic definitions provided so
far cover some features of language but are far from complete. We
cannot speak of human language without taking into consideration the
human being ie molecular biology, psychology, cognition,
anthropology.... or those human created disciplines like information
technology. What is needed now is an interdisciplinary view based on
the latest advances in these disciplines.

Uttering utterances means a duality of signs must first be generated so
that others can add on it or change it. The first utterance triggers a
phenomenon not void of some sort of tie which later becomes weaker or
even completely distanced. But the link is still there. Thus generation
means transcending the limits of convention and arbitrariness.

Human experience is chaotic but schema, although analogue, gives the
necessary structure to it. It is not arbitrary. Everybody is equipped
with such a schema. For example schema of OUT is moving things in
physical space then it is extended to a metaphor. Schematic
understanding at various levels of linguistic expression is important.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Confessions of a Python fanboy
    ... The more line-noise, the worse the language. ... , that the arbitrariness is lost. ... operator in any programming language using Latin symbols, ... At least Ruby defines operators using the actual name of the operator ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • Re: The Myth of Arbitrariness
    ... >> some non-arbitrary elements in language. ... >> But arbitrariness is still the typical situation. ... the bulk of words in our ordinary vocabulary, even linguists are not ... > with such a schema. ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: What ushered in the age of Modern English?
    ... The influence of Shakespeare on the language tends to be exaggerated. ... Caxton introduced printing to England (or 1475, ... arbitrariness of these periodizations. ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: _Verum Et Factum Convertuntur_ (or: Surprised By Syntax)
    ... Even with this arbitrariness, learning the ... There may indeed be many such, but they do not have a very profound appreciation of how language works. ... Grammar and vocabulary are essential and inextricable parts of a language. ... posters think the difference is between natural language and mathematics. ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Godels comments about the "true reason" for incompleteness
    ... refuted the schema P&~P->Q ... refute that schema by proving a contradiciton. ... PA refutes EVERY sentence in the language of PA if PA ... Under your notion of 'consistency sentence', in first order, any valid ...
    (sci.logic)