Re: The reason of implementation of morphological operator in FPGA
- From: Richard Herring <junk@[127.0.0.1]>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:57:39 +0000
In message <438C7490.2FD7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter T. Daniels <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
Richard Herring wrote:
In message <1133243655.314911.129840@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, TMU <m.hajirahimi@xxxxxxxxx> writes >hi >I have studied some papers of implementation of morphological operator >in FPGA and ASIC. >I want to know the reason of implementation of morphological operator >in FPGA. >Does FPGA implementation use only in test of our design? >and what is the meaning of realtime processing? (the required speed of >chip) >can anyone help me?
You are in the wrong newsgroup. sci.lang is for discussion of ( (natural) languages and linguistics. You'd be better off finding a group in the comp.* hierarchy - maybe comp.arch.fpga ?
That was the same poster who asked about "asic" yesterday. From the header I thought it was asking about Basic English, but the message contained the above sort of gobbledygook.
Application-Specific Integrated Circuits and Field-Programmable Gate Arrays.
-- Richard Herring .
- References:
- The reason of implementation of morphological operator in FPGA
- From: TMU
- Re: The reason of implementation of morphological operator in FPGA
- From: Richard Herring
- Re: The reason of implementation of morphological operator in FPGA
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- The reason of implementation of morphological operator in FPGA
- Prev by Date: Re: To be + infinitive
- Next by Date: Re: Does Media = Real Life?
- Previous by thread: Re: The reason of implementation of morphological operator in FPGA
- Next by thread: Does Media = Real Life?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|