Re: Natural Language Praised
- From: Joachim Pense <spam-collector@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 12:33:37 +0100
Am 3 Dec 2005 01:58:12 -0800 schrieb leuwarden@xxxxxxxxx:
> Ron Hardin wrote:
>> Somebody has this as their .sig
>>
>> "Natural language has evolved to the present point in a way optimally to
>> meet the needs for two-way human communication." -- Vincent E. Guiliano,
>> "In Defense of Natural Language," 1972
>
> "evolved" : do you mean to say you have seen progress? where?
>
> many languages have died out, Latin for instance; do you think it was
> of a lesser quality?
What makes you think Latin died out?
Joachim
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Natural Language Praised
- From: leuwarden
- Re: Natural Language Praised
- References:
- Re: Natural Language Praised
- From: leuwarden
- Re: Natural Language Praised
- Prev by Date: Re: Be and Have in Hebrew, and ACC case
- Next by Date: Re: Is there an optimal sequence for language acquisition?
- Previous by thread: Re: Natural Language Praised
- Next by thread: Re: Natural Language Praised
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|