Re: Natural Language Praised
- From: "Yusuf B Gursey" <ybg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 3 Dec 2005 11:51:00 -0800
leuwarden@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> do you mean I ought to find a better term?
>
> Latin is no longer alive. is it being kept alive in the Church? I read
> that Ratzinger was going to try and bring it back. Maybe he ought to,
> but what are the chances? I do not know, and I have not seen any debate
> about this.
I vaguely know that Latin was dropped or demoted as a working or
official
language of Vatican City only fairly recently.
I also know that Vatican radio had, and perhaps still has, Latin radio
broadcasts.
>
> I have been told that Hebrew has been revived 100%, but I am alsmost
> sure that is a different story. Also, it was not a recent development,
> not some kind of political program, but something that started way back
> in the 19th century.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Natural Language Praised
- From: leuwarden
- Re: Natural Language Praised
- References:
- Re: Natural Language Praised
- From: leuwarden
- Re: Natural Language Praised
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: Natural Language Praised
- From: leuwarden
- Re: Natural Language Praised
- Prev by Date: Is it possible to devise a common linguistic ontology?
- Next by Date: Re: a little help
- Previous by thread: Re: Natural Language Praised
- Next by thread: Re: Natural Language Praised
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading