Re: Is there an optimal sequence for language acquisition?
- From: Lee Sau Dan <danlee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 04 Dec 2005 11:36:27 +0800
>>>>> "leuwarden" == leuwarden <leuwarden@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
leuwarden> .... and the motivation! the inclination! if your new
leuwarden> girl friend speaks Chinese, you'll speak Chinese by
leuwarden> Christmas
I already speak Chinese.
And you're wrong. My cousin (Chinese) has a boy friend (Anglo-Saxon
ancestry, from New Zealand) for many years. They're getting married
in a few months. This guy has been living in Hong Kong for more than
1 year. My cousin's mother speaks no English (other than making up
broken English from the limited vocabulary she could handle). And I
have had many dinner gatherings with this pair and other family
members. At these gatherings, there is a lot of chatting in
Cantonese. Only occasionally do we -- this generation who has learnt
English -- talk to this NZ guy in English, or translation the current
chatting contents to/from English.
If your theory is correct, how come this guy from NZ, having a
HK-immigrant girl-friend for years, living in HK for over 18 months,
surrounded by people speaking Cantonese, has not yet mastered
Cantonese by *last* Christmas?
leuwarden> I only know about English, and English is non-typical
leuwarden> as a language in many regards. Still, I found that
leuwarden> women learn more easily than men and that the best
leuwarden> learners,
Because women like to talk more than men do?
My impression is that men generally tend to think more and talk less
than women do.
leuwarden> there is yet another problem: what is the aim? at what
leuwarden> point do you really *know* a language?
That's why I hate to answer questions like: which/how many languages
do you _know_? Well... please tell me how you define "knowing a
language" first. Then, define "a language" (vs. "dialect", and
probably also "accent").
leuwarden> For most adult people it would be necessary to read and
leuwarden> write;
I don't think so. Many languages are not written.
leuwarden> spoken exercises are too strenuous for them.
Why?
leuwarden> But most people hate writing and reading. They try to
leuwarden> memorize instead. They fail.
Yeah. And most people hate learning, too. If not, why are softwares
selling the (bogus) quality of being "easy to learn" or even
"intuitive"?
--
Lee Sau Dan 李守敦 ~{@nJX6X~}
E-mail: danlee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Home page: http://www.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/~danlee
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is there an optimal sequence for language acquisition?
- From: leuwarden
- Re: Is there an optimal sequence for language acquisition?
- From: leuwarden
- Re: Is there an optimal sequence for language acquisition?
- References:
- Is there an optimal sequence for language acquisition?
- From: ck
- Re: Is there an optimal sequence for language acquisition?
- From: leuwarden
- Re: Is there an optimal sequence for language acquisition?
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: Is there an optimal sequence for language acquisition?
- From: leuwarden
- Is there an optimal sequence for language acquisition?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is there an optimal sequence for language acquisition?
- Next by Date: Re: Is there an optimal sequence for language acquisition?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is there an optimal sequence for language acquisition?
- Next by thread: Re: Is there an optimal sequence for language acquisition?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|