Re: Natural Language Praised

From: Ruud Harmsen <realemailseesite13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 16:59:56 +0100

Mon, 05 Dec 2005 15:19:52 GMT: "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: in sci.lang:

>> you know, poetry that is not spontaneous in its origin is nothing.
>> Rhyme and white space around it are really not what matters.
>
>There's _still_ no reason why poets couldn't write in Latin today.

I've seen Latin translations of modern pop songs, like "The Yellow
Submarine".

--
Ruud Harmsen - http://rudhar.com

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Natural Language Praised
  - From: Ron Hardin

References:
- Re: Natural Language Praised
  - From: leuwarden
- Re: Natural Language Praised
  - From: Joachim Pense
- Re: Natural Language Praised
  - From: leuwarden
- Re: Natural Language Praised
  - From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Natural Language Praised
  - From: leuwarden
- Re: Natural Language Praised
  - From: Peter T. Daniels

Prev by Date: Re: Is there an optimal sequence for language acquisition?
Next by Date: Re: foods named after places
Previous by thread: Re: Natural Language Praised
Next by thread: Re: Natural Language Praised
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread