Re: So it is true...
- From: "Paul J Kriha" <paul.nospam.kriha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 22:41:06 +1300
piotrpanek <piotrpanekQQQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:dn13i8$4tg$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Wiktor S. napisał(a):
>
> >> There does seem to be a distinct shortage of ethnonyms in the Slav
> >> world. (Serbs and Sorbs represent another one which occurs in 2
> >> places).
>
> In Polish both are called "Serbowie", but for Lusatian Sorbs it is
> rather archaism, while "Łużyczanie" is typical.
>
>
> >
> >
> > There was also Slovincian language,
>
> Rather a dialect of Pomeranian language. The sister dialect of Cassubic.
>
> > spoken once in what is now northern
> > Poland. In Polish, Slovincian is "słowiński", Slavic is "słowiański",
> > Slovenian is "słoweński" and Slovak is "słowacki".
>
> And Slavonian (East Croatia) is "Slawoński".
A different "l" then in the other ones?
pjk
> pzdr
> piotrek
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: So it is true...
- From: piotrpanek
- Re: So it is true...
- References:
- Re: So it is true...
- From: Seán O'Leathlóbhair
- Re: So it is true...
- From: Paul J Kriha
- Re: So it is true...
- From: Seán O'Leathlóbhair
- Re: So it is true...
- From: Christian Weisgerber
- Re: So it is true...
- From: Paul J Kriha
- Re: So it is true...
- From: andrew_woode
- Re: So it is true...
- From: Wiktor S.
- Re: So it is true...
- From: piotrpanek
- Re: So it is true...
- Prev by Date: Re: Be and Have in Hebrew, and ACC case
- Next by Date: Re: foods named after places
- Previous by thread: Re: So it is true...
- Next by thread: Re: So it is true...
- Index(es):
Loading