Re: Natural Language Praised
- From: Richard Herring <junk@[127.0.0.1]>
- Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 10:20:41 +0000
In message <43946D7A.62EF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ron Hardin <rhhardin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
[...]
All that means is that Google has seen "lucubrationes" somewhere before, but not "lucubrationibus". Google doesn't speak Latin.Search for the opening line
Tametsi multis in lucubrationibus recentioribus satis ...
hmm
nothing found, but Google does suggest Trudsdell's Latin is wrong
Did you mean: Tametsi multis in lucubrationes recentioribus satis
so perhaps it's not such a dead language after all, if Google is correcting it, even if wrongly.
Yet.
-- Richard Herring .
- References:
- Re: Natural Language Praised
- From: leuwarden
- Re: Natural Language Praised
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: Natural Language Praised
- From: leuwarden
- Re: Natural Language Praised
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Natural Language Praised
- From: leuwarden
- Re: Natural Language Praised
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Natural Language Praised
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Natural Language Praised
- From: Ron Hardin
- Re: Natural Language Praised
- Prev by Date: Re: So it is true...
- Next by Date: Re: Is there an optimal sequence for language acquisition?
- Previous by thread: Re: Natural Language Praised
- Next by thread: Re: Natural Language Praised
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|