Re: So it is true...

In message <439455EE.5FB5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter T. Daniels <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
Seán O'Leathlóbhair wrote:

*** T. Winter wrote:
> In article <1133777483.827286.191030@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >"=?iso-8859-1?B?U2XhbiBPJ0xlYXRobPNiaGFpcg==?=" <jwlawler@xxxxxxxxx> >
> ...
> > Some parents may want one
> > to help explain Harry Potter to their children. "Dad, what's a
> > lorry?", "Don't know son, some limey thing".
>
> Only if they read the UK edition, which is unlikely. The books have been
> translated to US English.
> --
> *** t. winter, cwi, kruislaan 413, 1098 sj amsterdam, nederland, >+31205924131
> home: bovenover 215, 1025 jn amsterdam, nederland; http://www.cwi.nl/~***/

I know that the first book was translated and this seemed
controversial.  I remember a long thread on the subject (probably in
alt.english.usage).  If I remember correctly, the majority opinion from
both sides of the Atlantic was that the translation was excessive.


It allegedly went beyond translation to revision. In particular,
changing "Philosopher's Stone" to "Sorcerer's Stone" is especially
egregious.

I thought that the later books were changed less.  Any American Harry
Potter readers out there?  Did you encounter any unfamiliar words,
grammar or usage?  If so, did it add to, or subtract from the enjoyment
of the books?


Here and there. Any puzzlement over such extraneous matters is a
distraction.

More of a concern, though, is that they have celebrations of "Christmas"
and "Easter" with no other indication that they are a Christian
society/institution.


Just like the Real World [tm], then ;-)

--
Richard Herring
.

Quantcast