Re: Article on Finno-Ugric in the Economist
- From: Harlan Messinger <hmessinger.removethis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:27:26 -0500
Peter T. Daniels wrote:
Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
"Marc Adler" <marc.adler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
http://www.economist.com/world/europe/displaystory.cfm?story_id=5323735
The article contains several inaccuracies, starting from the very first
sentence: it contains a purported Finnish statement, which however does not
even use Finnish punctuation (we always leave a space around a dash, and
normally use en dash, not em dash)
Whoa -- a spaced en-dash is _British_ style, and a closed-up em-dash is _American_ style, and The Economist is a British magazine!
Isn't The Economist the British magazine that also uses the US convention for numbers in the billions and trillions?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Article on Finno-Ugric in the Economist
- From: Aidan Kehoe
- Re: Article on Finno-Ugric in the Economist
- References:
- Article on Finno-Ugric in the Economist
- From: Marc Adler
- Re: Article on Finno-Ugric in the Economist
- From: Jukka K. Korpela
- Re: Article on Finno-Ugric in the Economist
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Article on Finno-Ugric in the Economist
- Prev by Date: Re: Advice for Advanced Learning in French
- Next by Date: French: THE absurd language (132/200)
- Previous by thread: Re: Article on Finno-Ugric in the Economist
- Next by thread: Re: Article on Finno-Ugric in the Economist
- Index(es):