Re: Latin pronunciation puzzle
- From: "ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx" <ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Dec 2005 22:40:48 -0800
Colin Fine wrote:
> If you are talking about English, this is false. <ph> as a digraph
> represents not only the same phoneme as <f> but the same phone. (I
> exclude cases where <ph> represents /ph/ and <f> represents /v/).
True for most native speakers. Non-native speakers who were never
formally taught that <ph> is to be pronounced [f], including yours
truly, can pronounce them differently; I still have a trace of my
original [p<h>] in some contexts but the difference is slight enough to
have passed unnoticed thus far.
> /f/ and /v/ differ in voicing. It is possible that there are other concommitent differences,
> but I am unable to detect any difference in
> the teeth and lip positions.
In certain dialects, there's a great deal of difference in positions
where /v/ is realized as an approximant. Compare a British Shakesperian
stage actor's <evil>/<ever> with any Anglo's <Eiffel>/<effort>.
> There is no /f/ (or /v/) in 'Attenborough'.
No. There is, however, one in <Atherton> pronounced by some Anglos and
Frogs, albeit an odd thing for Anglos and Frogs to agree on.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Latin pronunciation puzzle
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Latin pronunciation puzzle
- Prev by Date: Re: -eme and related suffixes
- Next by Date: Re: THE QUIZ...
- Previous by thread: Re: "Kai" and "Atros" translation
- Next by thread: Re: Latin pronunciation puzzle
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|