Re: Orthography supporting sound changes?
- From: Joachim Pense <spam-collector@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 22:06:09 +0100
Am Fri, 06 Jan 2006 13:31:45 GMT schrieb Peter T. Daniels:
> Joachim Pense wrote:
>>
>> In principle, It appears not to be impossible to me that reversals of lossy
>> sound changes could happen if the old pronounciation is preserved by
>> writing. I'm thinking of a reversal of a sound merger, or re-appearance of
>> a lost sound.
>>
>> Are there any reported examples of such sound change reversals having
>> happened, where it can be demonstrated (or at least is strongly believed by
>> many) that the orthography was the only preserver of the old situation (so
>> it was not also preserved by maybe regional or social variants of spoken
>> language)?
>>
>> Or are there strong arguments that this is impossible?
>
> Cf. Eng. peak/peek/Peke
What happened with these words?
Joachim
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Orthography supporting sound changes?
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Orthography supporting sound changes?
- References:
- Orthography supporting sound changes?
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: Orthography supporting sound changes?
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Orthography supporting sound changes?
- Prev by Date: Chinese languages or language?
- Next by Date: Re: Chinese languages or language?
- Previous by thread: Re: Orthography supporting sound changes?
- Next by thread: Re: Orthography supporting sound changes?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|