Re: effects of prescriptivism
- From: Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:46:37 +0100
Ar an t-ochtú lá de mí Eanair, scríobh Peter T. Daniels:
> > > No, the Grimms had no interest in synchronic linguistics, in German or
> > > Germanic dialects, and so on.
> >
> > Pray tell how someone with no interest in German comes, voluntarily, to
> > write an etymological dictionary of the language?
>
> First of all, they didn't come close to doing so;
They didn’t finish it, they certainly started it, voluntarily. They had a
demonstrated interest in German, Germanic dialects and Germanic languages.
> has the last volume been published yet?
1960.
> Second, "etymology" is the opposite of synchronic linguistics.
And? Diachronic linguistics is ruled out from linguistics because you say
so?
--
I AM IN JAIL AND ALLOWED SEND ONLY ONE CABLE SINCE WAS ARRESTED WHILE
MEASURING FIFTEEN FOOT WALL OUTSIDE PALACE AND HAVE JUST FINISHED COUNTING
THIRTY EIGHT THOUSAND FIVE HUNDERED TWENTY TWO NAMES WHOS WHO IN MIDEAST.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: effects of prescriptivism
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: effects of prescriptivism
- References:
- effects of prescriptivism
- From: sam c
- Re: effects of prescriptivism
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: effects of prescriptivism
- From: Aidan Kehoe
- Re: effects of prescriptivism
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: effects of prescriptivism
- From: Aidan Kehoe
- Re: effects of prescriptivism
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- effects of prescriptivism
- Prev by Date: Re: Chinese languages or language?
- Next by Date: Re: Orthography supporting sound changes?
- Previous by thread: Re: effects of prescriptivism
- Next by thread: Re: effects of prescriptivism
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|