Re: <ll> and <y> in Argentian Spanisg (was: Chinese languages or language?)
- From: Ruud Harmsen <realemailseesite13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:39:40 +0100
Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:10:30 +0100: Miguel Carrasquer <mcv@xxxxxx>: in
sci.lang:
>I was thinking more along the lines of "when you're
>recording, don't sing your [Z]'s too hissingly".
Could be. That the general problem about using songs as phonetic
evidence (like I so often do): singing is not speaking, let alone
spontaneous speaking.
--
Ruud Harmsen - http://rudhar.com
.
- References:
- Re: Chinese languages or language?
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Chinese languages or language?
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Chinese languages or language?
- From: Lee Sau Dan
- Re: Chinese languages or language?
- From: Nathan
- Re: Chinese languages or language?
- From: Aidan Kehoe
- Re: Chinese languages or language?
- From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Chinese languages or language?
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Chinese languages or language?
- From: Miguel Carrasquer
- <ll> and <y> in Argentian Spanisg (was: Chinese languages or language?)
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: <ll> and <y> in Argentian Spanisg (was: Chinese languages or language?)
- From: Miguel Carrasquer
- Re: Chinese languages or language?
- Prev by Date: Re: Time in various languages...
- Next by Date: Re: <ll> and <y> in Argentian Spanisg (was: Chinese languages or language?)
- Previous by thread: Re: <ll> and <y> in Argentian Spanisg (was: Chinese languages or language?)
- Next by thread: Re: Chinese languages or language?
- Index(es):