Re: Ministers and ministries?
- From: Colin Fine <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:47:55 +0000
Peter T. Daniels wrote:
John Atkinson wrote:
There seems to be a distinction made between a "Department" (of Health, say) -- a particular unit of bureaucracy -- and a "Ministry" (of Health, Education and Welfare, say) -- the post held by a minister, what they're in charge of -- as I said, a minister may be in charge of more than one department. At least, I think that distinction's made here in Oz.
In the USA, the "Secretary" in charge of a "Department" isn't a member of
Congress, nor are they (as a rule) a career public servant. They're
appointed by the president, and AIUI, have to be approved by Congress (not
sure about this).
("Confirmed.") By the Senate.
I'm just editing a history of Palestinian archeology and it mentions a British "undersecretary of state" in the 1930s -- which seemed odd on both counts. You've explained "secretary," but how does the Foreign Ministry relate to the State Department?
There's never been a State Department. "Secretary of State" is the title, and it can have an 'under-' or a 'for' attached to it.
Colin .
- References:
- Ministers and ministries?
- From: Tzortzakakis Dimitrios
- Re: Ministers and ministries?
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: Ministers and ministries?
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Ministers and ministries?
- Prev by Date: Re: the case of the conjoined NP
- Next by Date: Re: The crucial test
- Previous by thread: Re: Ministers and ministries?
- Next by thread: Re: Ministers and ministries?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|