Re: Pseudo-cleft ``who''
- From: Ron Hardin <rhhardin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 04:58:10 GMT
Brian M. Scott wrote:
> >> That it was a politician who nominated them caused the
> >> trouble.
>
> >> (with, of course, a different meaning).
>
> > There are two possible meanings for it, depending on
> > whether the ``who'' heads a restrictive relative clause
> > or an annex clause.
>
> And exactly the same possibilities would exist if 'they'
> were substituted for 'who'; it could still mean either
>
> (1) What caused the trouble was the circumstance
> that a politician nominated them.
>
> or
>
> (2) What caused the trouble was the circumstance
> that the entity here referred to as 'it' was a
> member of the set
>
> {x : x is a politician & x nominated them}.
>
> What's your point?
>
> Note that in context the two are very unlikely to be
> confused, since for (2) the antecedent of 'it' had better be
> obvious. Out of context the natural interpretation is
> obviously (1).
>
> [...]
The ``who'' shades it towards the relative clause, and the ``that'' towards
the annex clause.
The annex clause's ``that'' isn't a relativizer, but part of the formula for the
extraposition ``it was X that Y,'' where X can be almost any component of the
unextraposed clause, extraposed for focus or simplification.
It was quickly that he ran.
I suppose a personal adverb should get ``who''
It was personally who he served me.
Watch for it.
--
Ron Hardin
rhhardin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On the internet, nobody knows you're a jerk.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pseudo-cleft ``who''
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: Pseudo-cleft ``who''
- References:
- Pseudo-cleft ``who''
- From: Ron Hardin
- Re: Pseudo-cleft ``who''
- From: Jim Heckman
- Re: Pseudo-cleft ``who''
- From: Ron Hardin
- Re: Pseudo-cleft ``who''
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: Pseudo-cleft ``who''
- From: Ron Hardin
- Re: Pseudo-cleft ``who''
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: Pseudo-cleft ``who''
- From: Ron Hardin
- Re: Pseudo-cleft ``who''
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Pseudo-cleft ``who''
- Prev by Date: Re: Pseudo-cleft ``who''
- Next by Date: Re: kawa = "gabagaba"?
- Previous by thread: Re: Pseudo-cleft ``who''
- Next by thread: Re: Pseudo-cleft ``who''
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading