Re: kawa = "gabagaba"?
- From: "Marc Adler" <marc.adler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 Jan 2006 20:58:40 -0800
Bart Mathias wrote:
> Sounds like you don't believe it, but remember, it's not "gabagaba" but
> "gapagapa"!
Right. I thought about that, and the fact that kawaru was kaparu at
some point. But I mean come on. Don't both kawaru and kaeru come from
some kind of *kapu originally?
Actually, if that were the case, then that would fit with your -a
nominalizer.
> I advise taking them all as factual.
I will take them as Biblical truth.
Marc
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: kawa = "gabagaba"?
- From: Bart Mathias
- Re: kawa = "gabagaba"?
- References:
- kawa = "gabagaba"?
- From: Marc Adler
- Re: kawa = "gabagaba"?
- From: Bart Mathias
- kawa = "gabagaba"?
- Prev by Date: Re: Pseudo-cleft ``who''
- Next by Date: Re: Pseudo-cleft ``who''
- Previous by thread: Re: kawa = "gabagaba"?
- Next by thread: Re: kawa = "gabagaba"?
- Index(es):