Re: Stephen C. Levinson on Binding Conditions
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 14:38:11 GMT
Ray wrote:
HI,
Has anyone read his 1991 work entitled "Pragmatic reduction of the
Binding Conditions revisited"?
I'm reading it, and find it rather heavy going. One thing I still
cannot understand about the article, which I'm wading through for about
one week, is his association of the I-Principle and the presumption of
"clausemate core-argument disjointness". (e.g, in 'he hit him', 'he'
and 'him' are usually disjoint in reference, i.e. non-coreferential.)
He claims that the latter follows from the former, but I don't see the
connection.
Could anyone enlighten me?
You're not likely to find anyone at sci.lang who embraces Chomskyism,
whether 15-year-old or up to date, so this may not be the best place to
ask.
--
Peter T. Daniels grammatim@xxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: ``Guess whom''
- Next by Date: Re: Your first "linguistic" memory
- Previous by thread: Stephen C. Levinson on Binding Conditions
- Next by thread: Re: Stephen C. Levinson on Binding Conditions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|