Re: Expressiveness
- From: "Seán O'Leathlóbhair" <jwlawler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 9 Mar 2006 03:00:10 -0800
Aidan Kehoe wrote:
Ar an t-ochtú lá de mí Márta, scríobh Joachim Pense:
> [...] So seen in the large, the cases of losing and gaining
> expressiveness add up. And this results in the (dogmatic?) statement,
> that the expressiveness of a language is a constant, (and indeed that all
> "proper" languages are equally expressive). But I am not convinced that
> all those expressiveness changes really add up to zero.
The thing is, on the level António (not Seán!) is arguing about he is
certainly right; for example, you've just defined ,,editieren" in English,
when English didn't have a single verb for that, and with your definition,
you've demonstrated that English is as expressive as German for this
concept.
Please note that I was not arguing against the belief that all
languages are equally expressive. I was just exploring the foundation
of the belief and wondering why it is frequently expressed so
dogmatically.
<snip>
--
Seán O'Leathlóbhair
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Expressiveness
- From: Des Small
- Re: Expressiveness
- References:
- Question about Spanish
- From: foggytown
- Re: Question about Spanish
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Question about Spanish
- From: Felix Rawlings
- Re: Question about Spanish
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Question about Spanish
- From: Seán O'Leathlóbhair
- Expressiveness (was: Question about Spanish)
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: Expressiveness
- From: Aidan Kehoe
- Question about Spanish
- Prev by Date: Re: Question about Spanish
- Next by Date: Re: Expressiveness
- Previous by thread: Re: Expressiveness
- Next by thread: Re: Expressiveness
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|