Re: Expressiveness
- From: "Seán O'Leathlóbhair" <jwlawler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 9 Mar 2006 03:29:34 -0800
Des Small wrote:
"Seán O'Leathlóbhair" <jwlawler@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Please note that I was not arguing against the belief that all
languages are equally expressive. I was just exploring the
foundation of the belief and wondering why it is frequently
expressed so dogmatically.
Read Bodmer's lamentable _Loom of Langwidge_ (regrettably still in
print, but get it from a libry) and Sapir's _Langwidge_. Then you
will know.
I haven't read them but I have heard of them. The problem I see is
that the dogmatic style is liable to make the claim less convincing
rather than more.
--
Seán O'Leathlóbhair
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Expressiveness
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Expressiveness
- References:
- Question about Spanish
- From: foggytown
- Re: Question about Spanish
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Question about Spanish
- From: Felix Rawlings
- Re: Question about Spanish
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Question about Spanish
- From: Seán O'Leathlóbhair
- Expressiveness (was: Question about Spanish)
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: Expressiveness
- From: Aidan Kehoe
- Re: Expressiveness
- From: Seán O'Leathlóbhair
- Re: Expressiveness
- From: Des Small
- Question about Spanish
- Prev by Date: Re: Expressiveness
- Next by Date: Re: any language without person/number marking you know?
- Previous by thread: Re: Expressiveness
- Next by thread: Re: Expressiveness
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|