Re: Question about Spanish

On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 13:42:20 -0500, Harlan Messinger wrote:

Felix Rawlings wrote:
On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 09:53:23 +0000, Felix Rawlings wrote:


On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 22:41:58 +0000, Peter T. Daniels wrote:


foggytown wrote:

Dear Group,

I am doing some research for a short story and perhaps I can find some
assistance in here. Question: are there countries once colonized by
Spain where the daily spoken language is now a form of Spanish which
has so degraded that it would not be understood by Spaniards or other
(former) colonies?

Please don't say "degraded." It suggests that the language is somehow
inferior or inadequate. Whatever the social circumstances of its
speakers, the language is fully as expressive as that spoken by any
Castilian.

Two things: One, must you be so thoroughly politically correct all
the time? And two, where is the data to support your assertion in the
last sentence? Or is this a case of PC dogma first, scientific evidence
afterwards?

It's interesting to notice that replies so far have just focused on
chastising me, for daring to wonder if the original poster was motivated
by political correctness,

Well, gee, now I dare to wonder if you're being motivated by the Forces of
Darkness conspiring to wreak havoc on a defenseless universe. Does that
make sense?

Peter's motivation, as he stated explicitly, is that your characterization
of other languages as "degraded" is misguided.

Where in this thread did I use the word "degraded"?

People aren't motivated by political correctness.

What's this? Another assertion that we are supposed to take in faith?
I find it risible, to say the least, for evidence on the contrary is
abundant: e.g. why would anyone talk about dark colored, African natives
as "African-American"?

> and have confirmed that his opinion is correct,
again without producing any solid, scientific data to support it.

Solid evidence to support what? That languages don't "degrade"? You're
the one using the term "degraded". If you're going to use such a term,
you must have an idea what metric you're using to assess the degree of
degradedness of any given language. So why don't you tell us what that
metric is and try to convince us that it's of interest?

All this paragraph is irrelevant because, probably in the heat of the
moment, you couldn't be bothered to tell who said what. Let me insert here
the assertion that I want to discuss:

Whatever the social circumstances of its speakers, the language is fully
as expressive as that spoken by any Castilian.

OK, let's see the scientific support for that. That's all I am asking.
Where is it?

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Question about Spanish
    ... the language is fully as expressive as that spoken by any ... People aren't motivated by political correctness. ... If you're going to use such a term, you must have an idea what metric you're using to assess the degree of degradedness of any given language. ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: A Few Things Which Matt and Inabon Probably Wish Did Not Exist....
    ... you're the one who deals only with physical evidence. ... 458 Manchester from the 2nd century BCE is the oldest ... hebrew alphabet is in fact the Aramaic alphabet so an amateur conclusion from ... Hebrew was ever a spoken language. ...
    (soc.history.ancient)
  • Re: German population in Europe after fall of Roman Empire.
    ... complete foreign culture (including language) become practised by ... You say evidence of it does exist - ... >> Linguistics are a poor indicator as it relies VERY heavily on totally ... Instead, Old Norse ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: "Its uncertain whether intelligence has any long term
    ... There is ample evidence that "intelligence" has had considerable ... > with other animals run up against a critical problem - we are capable ... > of things that other animals are not (language being the obvious ... Natural selection propels some species along a ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: New line of thinking about the OT!
    ... another language they only moderately understand. ... no evidence the Judeans or anyone else ever spoke this "hebrew" there is no ... There is no evidence Hebrew was ever a spoken language. ... We have seen that the OT contains some true statements. ...
    (soc.history.ancient)