Re: Expressiveness
- From: "Seán O'Leathlóbhair" <jwlawler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 9 Mar 2006 07:33:36 -0800
Peter T. Daniels wrote:
Seán O'Leathlóbhair wrote:
Des Small wrote:
"Seán O'Leathlóbhair" <jwlawler@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Please note that I was not arguing against the belief that all
languages are equally expressive. I was just exploring the
foundation of the belief and wondering why it is frequently
expressed so dogmatically.
Read Bodmer's lamentable _Loom of Langwidge_ (regrettably still in
print, but get it from a libry) and Sapir's _Langwidge_. Then you
will know.
I haven't read them but I have heard of them. The problem I see is
that the dogmatic style is liable to make the claim less convincing
rather than more.
Um, Bodmer's book is total crap. Sapir's book is a candidate for
greatest book on language ever written. (It has apparently been
abandoned by its original publisher and is now a Dover reprint.)
I took that to be Des's point in picking those examples. I have
sampled Sapir but not read it fully. I have heard of Loom of Language
but never seen it.
--
Seán O'Leathlóbhair
.
- References:
- Question about Spanish
- From: foggytown
- Re: Question about Spanish
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Question about Spanish
- From: Felix Rawlings
- Re: Question about Spanish
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Question about Spanish
- From: Seán O'Leathlóbhair
- Expressiveness (was: Question about Spanish)
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: Expressiveness
- From: Aidan Kehoe
- Re: Expressiveness
- From: Seán O'Leathlóbhair
- Re: Expressiveness
- From: Des Small
- Re: Expressiveness
- From: Seán O'Leathlóbhair
- Re: Expressiveness
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Question about Spanish
- Prev by Date: Re: UTM
- Next by Date: Re: any language without person/number marking you know?
- Previous by thread: Re: Expressiveness
- Next by thread: Re: Question about Spanish
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|