Re: Question about Spanish
- From: António Marques <m.ap@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:04:01 +0000
Felix Rawlings wrote:
We are discussing a simple assertion, to wit, whether some language
derived from Castilian is, or is not, as fully as expressive as that
spoken by any Castilian (your words). Your answer to this is an
unqualified, unsupported, dogmatic yes.
Some people (I, among them) are not convinced that this assertion is obviously true (...)
Then, by definition, you must have in mind something that may be expressible in spanish but not in the hypothetical language. It being...?
(this is getting repetitive.)
--
am
laurus : rhodophyta : brezoneg : smalltalk : stargate
.
- References:
- Question about Spanish
- From: foggytown
- Re: Question about Spanish
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Question about Spanish
- From: Felix Rawlings
- Re: Question about Spanish
- From: Felix Rawlings
- Re: Question about Spanish
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: Question about Spanish
- From: Felix Rawlings
- Re: Question about Spanish
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Question about Spanish
- From: Felix Rawlings
- Question about Spanish
- Prev by Date: Re: Places to study linguistics in Canada
- Next by Date: Re: Of concern only for filologists
- Previous by thread: Re: Question about Spanish
- Next by thread: Re: Question about Spanish
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading