Re: Of concern only for filologists
- From: Harlan Messinger <hmessinger.removethis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 09:28:01 -0500
hagen wrote:
I understand that I _a Dane_ have used an obscure turn of flowery
phrase; even in sci.lang, unforgivable.
I don't care whether it's obscure or not. My remark had to do with the word serving no purpose in the sentence in which it occurred. The result was that it looked like a randomly inserted big word.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Of concern only for filologists
- From: hagen
- Re: Of concern only for filologists
- References:
- Of concern only for filologists
- From: hagen
- Re: Of concern only for filologists
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Of concern only for filologists
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: Of concern only for filologists
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Of concern only for filologists
- From: hagen
- Of concern only for filologists
- Prev by Date: Re: Of concern only for filologists
- Next by Date: You do not explain anything!
- Previous by thread: Re: Of concern only for filologists
- Next by thread: Re: Of concern only for filologists
- Index(es):