Re: Question for Yusuf B Gursi
- From: "Yusuf B Gursey" <ybg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 18 Mar 2006 22:44:08 -0800
Yusuf B Gursey wrote:
Dr. Jamshid Ibrahim wrote:
This change of word order could be for reasons of emphasis. On the
I agree.
my point was that this device could not be so easily employed in
"Neo-Arabic" - without case endings.
other hand separating 3allh from Rasu:l could also show subordination.
I believe it needs more discusssion since as Yusuf pointed out it could
lead (if not not to blasphemy because the Prophet is not the same as
God) but at least to putting the prophet and Mushriku:n on the same
that would be very blasphemous.
level when the case ending is left out. The word Rasu:l completes or
seals the statement.
.
- References:
- Question for Yusuf B Gursi
- From: abu_abdulrahman2002
- Re: Question for Yusuf B Gursi
- From: Yusuf B Gursey
- Re: Question for Yusuf B Gursi
- From: Dr. Jamshid Ibrahim
- Re: Question for Yusuf B Gursi
- From: Yusuf B Gursey
- Question for Yusuf B Gursi
- Prev by Date: Re: Question for Yusuf B Gursi
- Next by Date: Re: Telling time in Tunisia: the "drej"
- Previous by thread: Re: Question for Yusuf B Gursi
- Next by thread: Re: Question for Yusuf B Gursi
- Index(es):