Re: I f I can't, no-one should

Peter T. Daniels wrote:
Harlan Messinger wrote:
hagen wrote:
Why was it, that no decipherment of the Phaistos disc, in a
scientifically level, was accepted earlier? Because it was casted out
that as long as no other examples of the same "script and language"
had been found, no-one could claim to have deciphered those famous
glyphs.
This statement obviously evoke resonance, psychologically ( A little
irritated: if I could not find the key, no-one can) , but in my finding
of the unexpected key, this statement became a phrase: still everyone
knows, but no-one admits my Victory, due to this phrase.
The fact is, that no-one came up with any examples of inscriptions
hiding similar latent symmetries as I've shown present in those
particular imprints. Even a physical proof has been laid on the table.
Since written material by and large doesn't have "latent symmetries" and
most people don't embed keys into what they write with the view that
some day two thousand years hence someone else unfamiliar with the
script will want to decipher it from one lone document, it seems to me
that if the Phaistos disk has "latent symmetries" and what you imagine
to be a key embedded in it, then ipso facto it is NOT an example of
written material.

I tried that one when he first turned up a few months(?) ago, and he had
no response.

I don't understand his response this time. What are these "mystery settings" that I managed unwittingly to avoid?
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: I f I cant, no-one should
    ... knows, but no-one admits my Victory, due to this phrase. ... hiding similar latent symmetries as I've shown present in those ... script will want to decipher it from one lone document, ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: I f I cant, no-one should
    ... knows, but no-one admits my Victory, due to this phrase. ... script will want to decipher it from one lone document, ... that if the Phaistos disk has "latent symmetries" and what you imagine ... I don't understand his response this time. ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: I f I cant, no-one should
    ... knows, but no-one admits my Victory, due to this phrase. ... most people don't embed keys into what they write with the view that some day two thousand years hence someone else unfamiliar with the script will want to decipher it from one lone document, it seems to me that if the Phaistos disk has "latent symmetries" and what you imagine to be a key embedded in it, then ipso facto it is NOT an example of written material. ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: I f I cant, no-one should
    ... script will want to decipher it from one lone document, ... As for saying that "the Disk is exactly the same thing" (as the Linear ... the great Grapheus has gone out of his sleep again, ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: I f I cant, no-one should
    ... script will want to decipher it from one lone document, ... all deciphered tablets from the Minoan and Mycenaean ... As for saying that "the Disk is exactly the same thing" (as the Linear ...
    (sci.lang)