Re: Why can't daddy?
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:11:56 GMT
Lee Sau Dan wrote:
"Ruud" == Ruud Harmsen <realemailseesite13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> How much time a day does a child spend on learning a language?
Ruud> 14 hours a day?
>> How much time a day can an adult afford on learning a language?
Ruud> 20 hours a week, if an intensive course, otherwise 3.
Based on these guesstimations, a child learning a language over 3
years spends 50% more time than an adult taking an intensive course
for 10 years.
I believe any adult taking an intensive course of a second language X
for 10 years will be more fluent in a language than any 3 year-old
child who speaks language X natively. In addition, the adult should
be literate by that time, whereas the 3-year-old still needs to learn
to read.
So, aren't adults learning languages more efficiently than infants?
Your religious faith, however touching, has nothing whatsoever to do
with the facts.
--
Peter T. Daniels grammatim@xxxxxxx
.
- References:
- Why can't daddy?
- From: peng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why can't daddy?
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Why can't daddy?
- From: Nathan
- Re: Why can't daddy?
- From: Claudio Grondi
- Re: Why can't daddy?
- From: Lee Sau Dan
- Re: Why can't daddy?
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Why can't daddy?
- From: Lee Sau Dan
- Why can't daddy?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why can't daddy?
- Next by Date: Re: Why can't daddy?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why can't daddy?
- Next by thread: Re: Why can't daddy?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading