Re: Settling an Argument - Assembly *IS* a Language, Right?
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2006 13:48:30 GMT
me wrote:
Raymond S. Wise wrote:
Neeraj Mathur , addressing <hanumizzle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote
linguistics courses. 'Human language', or better, 'natural language'
refers to those systems that are L1 transmitted - that is, things that
children can learn from their community. Lojban, and other constructed
languages, don't qualify at all, much less programming languages. If you
want to gain a
There are native Esperanto speakers, "denaskaj Esperantistoj," yet it
is a constructed language.
Where are there native Esperanto speakers?
And if they ever meet, can they understand each other?
--
Peter T. Daniels grammatim@xxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Settling an Argument - Assembly *IS* a Language, Right?
- From: António Marques
- Re: Settling an Argument - Assembly *IS* a Language, Right?
- References:
- Re: Settling an Argument - Assembly *IS* a Language, Right?
- From: Raymond S. Wise
- Re: Settling an Argument - Assembly *IS* a Language, Right?
- From: me
- Re: Settling an Argument - Assembly *IS* a Language, Right?
- Prev by Date: Re: Settling an Argument - Assembly *IS* a Language, Right?
- Next by Date: Re: Settling an Argument - Assembly *IS* a Language, Right?
- Previous by thread: Re: Settling an Argument - Assembly *IS* a Language, Right?
- Next by thread: Re: Settling an Argument - Assembly *IS* a Language, Right?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading