Re: The map of typological features
- From: "Yusuf B Gursey" <ybg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 14 Jun 2006 07:56:02 -0700
John Atkinson wrote:
"Yusuf B Gursey" <ybg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote...
John Atkinson wrote:
"Yusuf B Gursey" <ybg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote...
IIRC the arabs in order to study the [Maldivian] language had
assigned numbers for the local letters, leading to a new orthogrpahy.
Yes, but the numbering is completely different from that traditionally
assigned to the Arabic letters with the same (i.e., cognate) names: Thus:
Thaana letter 'haa' [h] is apparently derived from Arabic number 1; the
cognate Arabic letter denotes 8 in arabic
'noonu' [n] derives from Arabic number 3; it's 50 in Arabic
'raa' [r] derives from Arabic number 4; it's 200 in Arabic
'baa' [b] derives from Arabic number 5; it's 2 in Arabic
'kaafu' [k] derives from Arabic number7; it's 20 in Arabic
'alifu' [0] derives from Arabic number 8; it's 1 in Arabic
'vaavu' [v] derives from Arabic number 9; it's 6 in Arabic
'meemu' [m] derives from old Maldivian number 1; it's 40 in Arabic
'faafu' [f] derives from OM number 2; /fa:'/ is 80 in Arabic
'dhaalu' [d] derives from OM number 3; it's 4 in Arabic
'thaa' [t] derives from OM number 4; it's 500 in Arabic
'laamu' [l] derives from OM number 5; it's 30 in Arabic
'gaafu' [g] derives from OM number 6; /qa:f/ is 100 in Arabic
'seenu' [s] derives from OM number 8; it's 300 in Arabic
(The other 10 Thaana consonant names don't come from Arabic -- they're
named
for their sounds, which don't occur in Arabic, followed by "-aviyana".)
Since hardly any of the present-day Thaana letters look much like any
Arabic
letters or numbers, it's hard -- for me anyway -- to check by looking at
them which letters derive from which Arabic numbers. I haven't even
tried.
I've assumed that they're the same as the present-day order of consonants
in
the Thaana alphabet. I should have used the seventeenth-century order.
I
know that there have been some changes in order over time, so a few of my
"derives from"s are likely wrong.
Anyway, it certainly seems that the bloke who invented the script around
1600, whether he was an arab or a local, didn't know the order of the
Arabic
ABC.
it's the "abjad" or numerology order you are talking about which is
different from the dictionary order.
Yes, I was using the abjad order.
there is no reason why he should
have made tortuous 'equivalents' to the abjad order in the first place.
he just wanted to deal with more familiar symbols.
He doesn't seemed to have used any order at all -- neither adjab, Arabic
dictionary, or Sinhalese (or other Brahmi-derived)
the origin of the order I don't know. h begins south arabian.
I did find resemblences to eastern arabic numerals from the writing I
saw on stamps.
OK. I've only looked at standard Arabic in printed form. If you want to
compare Thaana with any sort of Arabic you know of, it's available at
well, the numerals are similar, and vaguely the others.also the vowel
signs.
http://www.omniglot.com/writing/thaana.htm
Note that the consonants and vowels listed there are in the official
alphabetical order if you read them _from right to left_.
The thiki jehee thaana, however, are in a different order from WWS. I don't
know which is right -- or if there is a recognised order at all for these.
Be interesting to hear any conclusions you come to.
John.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The map of typological features
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: The map of typological features
- References:
- Re: The map of typological features
- From: Darkstar
- Re: The map of typological features
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: The map of typological features
- From: Darkstar
- Re: The map of typological features
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: The map of typological features
- From: Darkstar
- Re: The map of typological features
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: The map of typological features
- From: Darkstar
- Re: The map of typological features
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: The map of typological features
- From: Darkstar
- Re: The map of typological features
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: The map of typological features
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: The map of typological features
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: The map of typological features
- From: Yusuf B Gursey
- Re: The map of typological features
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: The map of typological features
- From: Yusuf B Gursey
- Re: The map of typological features
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: The map of typological features
- Prev by Date: Re: The map of typological features
- Next by Date: Re: alfombra
- Previous by thread: Re: The map of typological features
- Next by thread: Re: The map of typological features
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading