Re: Trivial and trivium
- From: Joachim Pense <snob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 07:55:40 +0200
Am Mon, 19 Jun 2006 08:32:49 +0300 schrieb Jukka K. Korpela:
Joachim Pense <snob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> scripsit:
I think the point of the question was that the attribution of
current-meaning "trivial" to the Trivium happened only in the
Renaissance, not in the Middle Ages.
Besides, the
question actually asked whether the word "trivial" _acquired_ its current
meaning during the Renaissance.
That's what I mean.
Joachim
.
- References:
- Trivial and trivium
- From: Steven Jones
- Re: Trivial and trivium
- From: Jukka K. Korpela
- Re: Trivial and trivium
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: Trivial and trivium
- From: Jukka K. Korpela
- Trivial and trivium
- Prev by Date: Re: Trivial and trivium
- Next by Date: Re: Vinca script, cross bar angle - Ki Ri Ke
- Previous by thread: Re: Trivial and trivium
- Next by thread: Re: Trivial and trivium
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|