Re: Why "aren't I"?
- From: "Ekkehard Dengler" <ED-RS@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:10:22 +0200
"Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:19iuvadkr4xx2$.uacdiun3vcab.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 11:37:18 -0500, me <noreply@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote in <2lTog.11118$f76.3399@dukeread06">news:2lTog.11118$f76.3399@dukeread06> in sci.lang:
Nathan wrote:
Thomas Carter wrote:
Anybody know why and how the usage of "aren't I" became common place,
rather than the expected "am I not"?
We want a contraction, but we're afraid to use ain't.
Why not "amn't I"?:-)
Some dialects use it; even more did once. I believe that
it's still found in Scotland.
And Ireland.
Regards,
Ekkehard
.
- References:
- Why "aren't I"?
- From: Thomas Carter
- Re: Why "aren't I"?
- From: Nathan
- Re: Why "aren't I"?
- From: me
- Re: Why "aren't I"?
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Why "aren't I"?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why "aren't I"?
- Next by Date: Re: Why "aren't I"?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why "aren't I"?
- Next by thread: Re: Why "aren't I"?
- Index(es):