Re: WSJ anacoluthon
- From: Ron Hardin <rhhardin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:45:12 GMT
Peter T. Daniels wrote:
I don't read liberal columnists. They're not interesting. They don't
have anything to say.
If you don't read them, how do you know whether they're interesting, or
whether they have nothing to say?
Do you know about semantic shifts?
--
Ron Hardin
rhhardin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On the internet, nobody knows you're a jerk.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: WSJ anacoluthon
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: WSJ anacoluthon
- References:
- WSJ anacoluthon
- From: Ron Hardin
- Re: WSJ anacoluthon
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: WSJ anacoluthon
- From: Ron Hardin
- Re: WSJ anacoluthon
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- WSJ anacoluthon
- Prev by Date: Re: reading arabic, vowel trouble
- Next by Date: Re: WSJ anacoluthon
- Previous by thread: Re: WSJ anacoluthon
- Next by thread: Re: WSJ anacoluthon
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|