Re: Noun and Pronoun flexion in contemporary English
- From: Joachim Pense <snob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 08:47:22 +0200
Gorol wrote:
Joachim Pense wrote:
Am 16 Jul 2006 03:45:07 -0700 schrieb Gorol:
If you speak Austrian think about the example "Kimmtà scho wennst
Kimmta = Kommt er?
wårtst". Would you say the schwa which is attached at the first verb
is a verbal suffix?
Yes. (If the answer to my question above is "yes").
And what about -st at the conjunction "wenn".
It's an inflection of the conjunction.
I vaguely recall something similar exists in West Flemish, too.
Joachim
So what is your criterion to decide whether a morpheme is a suffix or
not? Kimmtà and kimmt er (accented) are equal.
I think it's up to the person who writes the grammar book.
Joachim
.
- References:
- Noun and Pronoun flexion in contemporary English
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: Noun and Pronoun flexion in contemporary English
- From: Gorol
- Re: Noun and Pronoun flexion in contemporary English
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: Noun and Pronoun flexion in contemporary English
- From: Gorol
- Re: Noun and Pronoun flexion in contemporary English
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: Noun and Pronoun flexion in contemporary English
- From: Gorol
- Noun and Pronoun flexion in contemporary English
- Prev by Date: Re: Noun and Pronoun flexion in contemporary English
- Next by Date: Re: Plausibility Check
- Previous by thread: Re: Noun and Pronoun flexion in contemporary English
- Next by thread: Re: Noun and Pronoun flexion in contemporary English
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|