Re: Sanskrit pronounciation sources


Christopher Culver wrote:
Ruud Harmsen <realemailseesite13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Like happens so often, wikipedia describes these many different but
related issues in a rather clear and unconfusing manner. PTD misses
a lot by ignoring this rich source of information. But that's his
choice. Living with blinkers/blinders on makes some people
happy. Not me.

For me, the problem with linking to Wikipedia is that it's silly to
cite a occasionally erroneous encyclopedia when all of us can find
undeniably reputable references at our university library, most of
which are far more detailed than an encyclopedia could be.

I gather there's no intrinsic reason why a w. entry couldn't be as
detailed as its many authors choose to make it.

Generality or superficiality aren't my objections.

.

Quantcast