Re: Sanskrit pronounciation sources
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 1 Aug 2006 14:37:54 -0700
Ruud Harmsen wrote:
31 Jul 2006 15:29:02 -0700: "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>: in sci.lang:
Ruud Harmsen wrote:
31 Jul 2006 04:31:26 -0700: "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>: in sci.lang:
Bad new ones do. Better ones, like _old_ copies of Encyclopedia
Brittanica, provide overview AND details. Wikipedia does too.
If you knew how to pronounce "Britannica,"
Analogous to Britannic?
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=Britannic.
you'd have a hard time misspelling it.
The spelling is irregular, considering the single t.
Do you suggest that the name of the island it's a latinization of be
changed to <Brittain>?
I won't reply, this is getting silly. Please find someone else to
discuss this topic.
Have you met Ross Clark?
Thank you for conceding you were mistaken.
.
- References:
- Re: Sanskrit pronounciation sources
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Sanskrit pronounciation sources
- From: Christopher Culver
- Re: Sanskrit pronounciation sources
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Sanskrit pronounciation sources
- From: Christopher Culver
- Re: Sanskrit pronounciation sources
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Sanskrit pronounciation sources
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Sanskrit pronounciation sources
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Sanskrit pronounciation sources
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Sanskrit pronounciation sources
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Sanskrit pronounciation sources
- Prev by Date: Re: Sanskrit pronounciation sources
- Next by Date: Re: Sanskrit pronounciation sources
- Previous by thread: Re: Sanskrit pronounciation sources
- Next by thread: Re: Sanskrit pronounciation sources
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|