Re: Plausibility Check
- From: "Franz Gnaedinger" <frgn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 24 Jul 2006 23:21:08 -0700
Peter T. Daniels wrote:
fact
Fact is you can't say how many words English had in
Shakespeare's time.
Back in 1974/75 I defined language as follows:
Language is the means of getting help, support and
understanding from those we depend upon in one way
or another --- and every means of getting help, support
and understanding may be called language, on whatever
level of life it occurs.
In the same years 1974/75 I stated a correlation between
human made things and words:
The level of life is mirrored in language. What is special
about human life? The use of things we made ourselves.
These human made things - artificial members and
organs beyond the human body - are mirrored in words.
Words denote human made things: cup, table, house ...
Human made things allow us to name natural entities
and appearances: ceiling - vault - heaven
A clay figurine of an animal or a human being allows
us to name animals and human beings
Life and soul are what is missing in clay figurines,
definitions ex negativo, again in correlation with
human made objects
A band led to the word and, German binden for to
bind, substantive Bund for union, und for and
I may add ancient Greek kairoeis for well chained or
warped (of a textile), firm, fast, solid, perhaps also
Latin foedus for union, fetialis for a contract among
nations, et for and.
The more things we use the more words we need.
A numerical correlation of the number of things and
the size of the vocabulary may be a topic of a doctoral
thesis.
D. Jensen should consider these relations when he
ponders the language of a future time, somewhere
between 2 500 and 12 000 AD - he should have at
least a vague idea of the material world in the time
his novel plays for coining a matching language.
Franz Gnaedinger www.seshat.ch
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Plausibility Check
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Plausibility Check
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Plausibility Check
- References:
- Re: Plausibility Check
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Plausibility Check
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Plausibility Check
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Plausibility Check
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Plausibility Check
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Plausibility Check
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Plausibility Check
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Plausibility Check
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Plausibility Check
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Plausibility Check
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Plausibility Check
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Plausibility Check
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Plausibility Check
- Prev by Date: Re: Best Grad Programs for Historical Linguistics
- Next by Date: Re: dirty English lessons for Japanese Woman !.......to funny
- Previous by thread: Re: Plausibility Check
- Next by thread: Re: Plausibility Check
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|