Re: Plausibility Check
- From: Nathan Sanders <nsanders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 12:27:12 -0700
In article <1155709872.086612.279810@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Franz Gnaedinger" <frgn@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Here is your attempt at defining language from Jan 23
2006 11:40 am (to be retrieved via Google):
A primarily arbitrary (i.e., non-logic)
"non-iconic"
two-way system
of communication that can express not only concrete
concepts,
"but also abstract concepts,"
including intelligibles
"intangibles"
If you're going to quote me, quote me correctly, instead of relying on
your typical inability to do proper research, which paints you as an
idiot and/or a liar.
Nathan
--
Nathan Sanders
Linguistics Program
Williams College
http://wso.williams.edu/~nsanders/
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Plausibility Check
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Plausibility Check
- References:
- Re: Plausibility Check
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Plausibility Check
- From: Nathan Sanders
- Re: Plausibility Check
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Plausibility Check
- From: Nathan Sanders
- Re: Plausibility Check
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Plausibility Check
- From: Nathan Sanders
- Re: Plausibility Check
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Plausibility Check
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: Plausibility Check
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Plausibility Check
- From: Nathan Sanders
- Re: Plausibility Check
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Plausibility Check
- From: António Marques
- Re: Plausibility Check
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Plausibility Check
- From: Nathan Sanders
- Re: Plausibility Check
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Plausibility Check
- From: Nathan Sanders
- Re: Plausibility Check
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Plausibility Check
- Prev by Date: Re: Varieties of Arabic
- Next by Date: Re: Can anybody identify this script?
- Previous by thread: Re: Plausibility Check
- Next by thread: Re: Plausibility Check
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|