Re: The entrance that solves
- From: "hagen" <dan5mark@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 21 Aug 2006 08:01:57 -0700
hagen wrote:
grapheus@xxxxxxx wrote:
hagen wrote:
grapheus@xxxxxxx wrote:
hagen wrote:
grapheus@xxxxxxx wrote:
hagen wrote:
Supervised by the good editor Ernst Grumach (not to be confused with
another authority: Groucho Marx), who must by then have wanted very
much to experience the disclosure of the secret behind the inscription
I talk about; The magazine 'Kadmos' invited scholars
internationally, to write brief articles about their knowledge upon
this special topic. Perhaps their mutual efforts could be pieced
together and uncover a kind of common denominator, an initial key to
this exciting enigma. It was in the midst of the last century, that
long ago!
What they could not achieve, I succeded completely! Twenty-two
stem-forms giving the denominator eleven (five point five). A system
of abbreviations, as firm as a rock leading to, that this old message
conseals the calendar. What afterwards went wrong, one can only guess,
but a perfect possibility to salute the entrance of the third millenium
was bypassed, that is for sure, if not caused by superstitious shadows
of the past 'kind of persons', then perhaps by mediocrity enviers.
As you know, those are not necesarily seperated from degrees of
position. God knows.
Hagen
Here it is. It conquers it all:
http://web.gvdnet.dk/GVD002393/phaistos.htm
Forever teasing you:
http://web.gvdnet.dk/GVD002393/gorella.gif
What is nice with you, Ole, is your way to make fallacious reasonings
which do not prove anything, or to put aside any non-calendaric
argument !
Example 1)- : you wrote : "Prosody, Metre ? NO !" One would have hoped
for a more substantial "demonstration" of such a categorical
statement... Well, there is none.
Example 2)-: You triumphantly wrote : E.F.A.N.K. ("Evidence for a
non-linguistic key) : "The various translations don't even follow a
common agreement upon the length of the sentences in a presumed text".
So what ?... Anybody knows that ALL the translations of the Phaistos
Disk but ONE, the Proto-Ionic Solution, are false. I asked you several
times to look at THIS solution and to read the J.Faucounau's books
(alas in French) "Les proto-Ioniens" and "Le déchiffrement du Disque
de Phaistos", and, only after that, to show -if you can do it !- that
something would be wrong with this solution. But you prefer playing
with the various number of FALSE solutions which have been proposed...
Regards
grapheus
http://www.theoi.com/Gallery/T33.2.html
http://www.dalank.de/notabene/pic1.html
What has this to do with the Phaistos Disk ?
grapheus
Sorry, it was only an ingredient of humour, that I feel victorious in
this case.
Showing Pasiphae nursing her child, and Minotauros the strategist
enveloping its prey :-)
According to your message above, it reminds me of this strategy:
If I choose B as my expression, then only A would have been acceptable.
Had I chosen A from the start, B or C were to prefer.
Hagen
You are wrong. You believe that saying that your theory is false is
motivated by a personal hostility against you, but this is untrue. On
the contrary, I sympathize with your effort, stemms' discovery and
tenacity. But I just believe that you have taken the wrong way : the
Disk is NOT Minoan, and it is NOT a calendar, that's all. And its
solution has been found since years, when the "Proto-Ionic Solution"
was published.
Regards
grapheus
The only way, to combine our two different conseptions of the disc, is
to solve the sudoku, that I've suggested, in an unambiguous way.
http://web.gvdnet.dk/GVD002393/f13c.htm
Letting the 22 stem-elements be the syllabary in a renewed battle to
reach the language that fits into this new form (Hebrew?)
Meaning that the calendrical geometries, that I unveil, are build into
the inscription very very skilfully by the instrumentality of
abbreviations by the constructor of the disc. Only this could unite my
calendar and yours language. In that case I've done my part
Regards
Hagen
Imagine a scenario of 22 couples holding 61 weekly meetings each year
If B, by way of example, is unavoidable detained, then A stands as
surety:(B)A. All 22 couples are obliged to participate by both in at
least two (4) weekly gatherings pro anno. A further set of complicated
rules are followed strictly, and carefully entered into the annual
minutes. Such construction, in its broader aspects, corresponds with
the platonic bodies that I've discovered, whereas a language-structure
in verse and with rhymes and grammar do not produces minutely
gnomonical arrangements by itself (v).
Point: The various translations don't even follow a common agreement
upon the length of the sentenses in a presumed text, because of its
complexity.- E.F.A.N.K. - ( Evidence for a non-linguistic key ).
http://web.gvdnet.dk/GVD002393/sudoku.htm
O.H.
.
- References:
- The entrance that solves
- From: hagen
- Re: The entrance that solves
- From: grapheus
- Re: The entrance that solves
- From: hagen
- Re: The entrance that solves
- From: grapheus
- Re: The entrance that solves
- From: hagen
- Re: The entrance that solves
- From: grapheus
- Re: The entrance that solves
- From: hagen
- The entrance that solves
- Prev by Date: Re: The etymology of the German Hell...
- Next by Date: Re: more "gaaf"
- Previous by thread: Re: The entrance that solves
- Next by thread: Can anybody identify this script?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
