Re: getting out of LaTeX
- From: "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:50:00 -0400
On 29 Aug 2006 19:17:37 -0700, "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<news:1156904257.139932.318240@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
in sci.lang:
*** T. Winter wrote:
[...]
Most mathematics publishers ask for camera-ready copy.
And the task
[...]
for the editor is to read the initial version, assign
reviewers to it and handle the process that follows.
And also may state to the writer that the paper is not
suitable for that publication, but that other
publications might use it. In which case just switching
the style sheets works perfectly well.
Mathematicians don't know which is the best journal for their
particular work?
The subject matter of a paper may be suitable for quite a
few journals. A journal for which a paper is otherwise
suitable may turn it down because the editor decides that it
isn't substantial enough.
[...]
Brian
.
- References:
- Re: getting out of LaTeX
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: getting out of LaTeX
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: getting out of LaTeX
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: getting out of LaTeX
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: getting out of LaTeX
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: getting out of LaTeX
- Prev by Date: Re: getting out of LaTeX
- Next by Date: Re: getting out of LaTeX
- Previous by thread: Re: getting out of LaTeX
- Next by thread: Re: getting out of LaTeX
- Index(es):