Re: /S/ /Z/ /tS/ etc.




Ruud Harmsen wrote:
1 Sep 2006 04:31:07 -0700: bogus61847688@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx: in sci.lang:

Non-Brazilian Portuguese is much more interesting (and unharsh, to my
liking) in this respect:
http://www.rudhar.com/foneport/en/not2port.htm#Note16d-Essiness

It might sound better partly because the girls short-circuit your brain.

That certainly is a factor, yes. Note though that some of my
[ex|s]amples are mail, pardon me, male. And that I keep disliking
American creaky voice English, no matter how beautiful the speaksters
are.
[All errors against the English language in the above are intentional]

Your claim about "American creaky voice English" was exposed as a lie
months ago. Why do you repeat it?

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: /S/ /Z/ /tS/ etc.
    ... It might sound better partly because the girls short-circuit your brain. ... American creaky voice English, no matter how beautiful the speaksters ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: /S/ /Z/ /tS/ etc.
    ... It might sound better partly because the girls short-circuit your brain. ... American creaky voice English, no matter how beautiful the speaksters ... [All errors against the English language in the above are intentional] ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: /S/ /Z/ /tS/ etc.
    ... American creaky voice English, no matter how beautiful the speaksters ... [All errors against the English language in the above are intentional] ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: /S/ /Z/ /tS/ etc.
    ... American creaky voice English, no matter how beautiful the speaksters ... [All errors against the English language in the above are intentional] ...
    (sci.lang)