Re: First language acquisition

"Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:1158164760.890133.149870@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:



Not at all. I do, however, believe the linguists who have recorded
their babies' every utterance and described the earliest stages of
language acquisition, around the world. If they say a rudimentary
grammar is in operation from the very first utterances, I tend to
believe their testimony.

Did they say what you asserted - "A human cannot learn vocabulary without
grammar, or vice versa."? "Having a rudimentary grammar from the very
first utternances" is not the same as "can't learn vocabulary without
grammar".


What is your evidence for "absence of grammar"?


Only from observations of babies talking. I can't believe that the first
few utterances of a baby, saying something like "dada" has any grammar in
it. It may get more complex very quickly, but not very first few
utterances which, as far as I can see, are largely mimicking of what the
parents say (which they often repeated over and over again to the baby
before it can even speak). I don't really know what the linguists means
when they say "from the very first utterances", what time period are they
talking about and do they mean "meaningful utterances"?

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: First language acquisition
    ... vocabulary without grammar, or vice versa. ... The baby may just be imitating what a parent is ... grammar is in operation from the very first utterances, ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: First language acquisition
    ... language acquisition, around the world. ... grammar is in operation from the very first utterances, ... when they say "from the very first utterances", ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Why does some cultures language become replaced but others dont?
    ... I'm replaying in my head utterances that ... written language as some sort of second-class citizen in comparison ... transmitting utterances to ... imputing them to linguists. ...
    (sci.lang)