Re: Warter, warter everywhere
- From: Mike Wright <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 22:37:12 -0500
Bart Mathias wrote:
Mike Wright wrote:
I had four friends say "water", and here are the results:
Two had /wart@r/ (or however that should be transcribed). One is from New York, by way of North Carolina. I'd say that he has a New York accent of some kind. The other, his girlfriend, is from Texas and has a fairly strong Texas accent.
The other two, like me, had /wat@r/. [...]
Did they really have two different sounds after the /t/, or is /@r/ a digraph for a single phoneme?
I don't have any idea what the phonemes of English are. I should have just written something like "warter" and "wahter".
To put it another way, if /@/ is to be established as a phoneme there, doesn't it have to contrast with some other phoneme in the same environment?
(I confess that I worry that my query might result from incipient Alzheimers.)
Yeah, I'm hoping that my memory problems are just due to random neurons being killed by ambient radiation or automobile emissions.
--
Mike Wright
http://www.raccoonbend.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Warter, warter everywhere
- From: Greg Lee
- Re: Warter, warter everywhere
- References:
- Warter, warter everywhere
- From: Mike Wright
- Re: Warter, warter everywhere
- From: Bart Mathias
- Warter, warter everywhere
- Prev by Date: Re: Glottal Tension
- Next by Date: Re: Warter, warter everywhere
- Previous by thread: Re: Warter, warter everywhere
- Next by thread: Re: Warter, warter everywhere
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|