Re: it is worth it

António Marques wrote:

dicaduca wrote:

Please, what is the function of the second 'it' in this sentence,


What I am looking for is the definition of those four 'darn' words in parsing terms:
it (first)= subject
is= copula
worth= nominal predicate(?)
it=???


In my 'lay analysis',

SUBJECT it
VERB is worth
DIRECT OBJECT it


subject verb predicate
preposition object-of-preposition
it is worth it

cf: It is near it.

Tak
--
----------------------------------------------------------------+-----
Tak To takto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--------------------------------------------------------------------^^
[taode takto ~{LU5B~}] NB: trim the xx to get my real email addr

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: it is worth it
    ... worth= nominal predicate ... Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: it is worth it
    ... What I am looking for is the definition of those four 'darn' words in ... worth= nominal predicate ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: it is worth it
    ... dicaduca wrote: ... worth= nominal predicate ...
    (sci.lang)
Quantcast