Re: Universal grammar
- From: Colin Fine <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 15:42:28 +0100
Ron Hardin wrote:
LEE Sau Dan wrote:Remind me not to read 'Critical Inquiry'.Hans> Personally I do not think so. But human written proofs are"Hans" == Hans Aberg <haberg@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Hans> structured so that it is very difficult to expect
Hans> a computer program like a theorem prover/proof checker to
Hans> parse it. The best hope is to get a program that
Hans> is sufficiently general so that a human can write theorems
Hans> and proofs anew in it. This then is essentially the same
Hans> problem as trying to parse other human written text.
You mean you want to write the theorems in the Prolog language, and
then use a Prolog engine to automatically construct the proofs?
I see in the current Critical Inquiry
``After four decades of research, development, and innovation in
information technology, computers are becoming more humanlike in their
behaviors. Research programs are underway to give computers ``emotions''
(although as software programs they remain very different from human
emotions mediated by the endocrine system and complex cortical feedback
loops). Object-oriented languages such as C++ are designed to mimic
in their structure and syntax human-only languages, making possible
more intuitive communication between humans and computers.''
N Katherine Hayes ``Trauma and Computer Code'' Critical Inquiry 33.1 p.156
These are intellectuals.
Colin
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Ron Hardin
- Re: Universal grammar
- References:
- Universal grammar
- From: Hans Aberg
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: groups
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Rob Freeman
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Herman Rubin
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Hans Aberg
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Ron Hardin
- Universal grammar
- Prev by Date: Re: Universal grammar
- Next by Date: Re: Phoneme analysis. (Motherhood statements?) (Long!)
- Previous by thread: Re: Universal grammar
- Next by thread: Re: Universal grammar
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|