Re: Universal grammar
- From: LEE Sau Dan <danlee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 21:21:36 +0800
"Rob" == Rob Freeman <groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> I do not know what you mean by this term. - I start thinking
>> about computer data compression. :-)
Rob> Good, good, Hans. We agree on something!! This is related to
Rob> the compressibility of strings.
Rob> The question, rephrased again, is, are all strings
Rob> compressible?
No. If they were, then what happens when you apply compression to the
string "it's possible" a zillion times? What's the result? And why
is it different from applying compressions a zillion times to "it's
impossible". There must be a way to discern these 2 strings. So,
after a zillion times of compression, the result must contain at least
1 bit. But shouldn't this 1-bit string be compressible, too? Then,
what happens if you try to compress this 1-bit string?
--
Lee Sau Dan 李守敦 ~{@nJX6X~}
E-mail: danlee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Home page: http://www.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/~danlee
.
- References:
- Universal grammar
- From: Hans Aberg
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Hans Aberg
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Hans Aberg
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: groups
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Hans Aberg
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: groups
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Hans Aberg
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Rob Freeman
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Hans Aberg
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Rob Freeman
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Hans Aberg
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Rob Freeman
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Hans Aberg
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Rob Freeman
- Universal grammar
- Prev by Date: Re: Universal grammar
- Next by Date: Re: Universal grammar
- Previous by thread: Re: Universal grammar
- Next by thread: Re: Universal grammar
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|