Re: Universal grammar
- From: Markus Triska <triska@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 17:19:57 +0200
haberg@xxxxxxxxxx (Hans Aberg) writes:
the first stepping stone are Prolog like programs. These
handle equations without bound variables (as quantifiers "all", "exist",
the Church "lambda" = function mapping "|->", etc.)
Free variables are implicitly "all"-quantified in Prolog.
Best wishes!
Markus Triska
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Hans Aberg
- Re: Universal grammar
- References:
- Universal grammar
- From: Hans Aberg
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Hans Aberg
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Hans Aberg
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: groups
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Hans Aberg
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: groups
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Hans Aberg
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Rob Freeman
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Hans Aberg
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Rob Freeman
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Hans Aberg
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Rob Freeman
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Hans Aberg
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Hans Aberg
- Universal grammar
- Prev by Date: Re: Universal grammar
- Next by Date: Re: Universal grammar
- Previous by thread: Re: Universal grammar
- Next by thread: Re: Universal grammar
- Index(es):