Re: Universal grammar
- From: "Rob Freeman" <groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 24 Oct 2006 03:27:13 -0700
Tak To wrote:
Rob Freeman wrote:
Tak To wrote:
I have the impression that you are conflating several different
issues here.
What different issues do you think I am conflating, Tak?
As enumerated in my post. Language universal, knowledge
representation, truth, etc.
You don't think the issues of "language universal, knowledge
representation, truth, etc." are related?
-Rob
.
- References:
- Universal grammar
- From: Hans Aberg
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Hans Aberg
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Hans Aberg
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: groups
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Hans Aberg
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: groups
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Tak To
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Rob Freeman
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Tak To
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Rob Freeman
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Tak To
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Rob Freeman
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Tak To
- Universal grammar
- Prev by Date: Re: Universal grammar
- Next by Date: Re: Universal grammar
- Previous by thread: Re: Universal grammar
- Next by thread: Re: Universal grammar
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|