Re: Universal grammar


Hans Aberg wrote:

I can't help you wit the Goethe idea, not knowing much about the context.

When I was a teenager I got a book on quantum physics.
A footnote said that the basic formula of mathematics,
q equals q, has not yet been investigated. So I began to
ponder this equation. What does it say? It speaks of a thing
or a being named q, and of another thing or being called q,
and it claims that both are identical. Are there any identical
things or beings? really identical ones? Apples vary in form,
size, color and taste. Even homozygotic twins differ, their
mothers can tell them apart ... One may read the above
equation in a second way: one thing or being q remains itself,
doesn't change in time, stays self-identical. I myself am always
changing, every day, year, decade. And what happens to an
apple when I eat it up? We may look at the basic formula of
mathematics in either way, it has no reality in our observable
world. The only objects that really satisfy the equation are
numbers and other mathematical objects. What are they good
for? They are ideals of our technical world. Let me explain this:

b = b = b = b ... --- with bricks (b, b, b, b ...) of the same
size one can build a stable wall

b = b --- if the bricks (b) keep their shape, neither soak
in the rain nor crumble in the summer heat, the wall remains
stable and solid

0.999... = 1 --- a door (0.999...) and its frame (1) must
correspond, otherwise the door is stuck, or there is a draft

9 = 1 + 3 + 5 = 9 --- one wishes to dismantle a machine (9)
into its compononents (1, 3, 5), in order to clean them, or to
repair the machine, and to reassemble them in order to get
back the well functioning machine one had before (9)

When I came this far, I read Goethe's formula "All is equal,
all unequal ..." (Wilhelm Meisters Wanderjahre, Aus Makariens
Archiv, at the end, originally meant to be in the middle) and got
excited. Goethe must have made the same discovery as I did,
long before me, and he explains his idea in many ways: he
applies it in his metamorphoses of plants and animals (one
key idea of the former has been confirmed by modern biology,
see Stephen Jay Gould, The Structure of Evolutionary Theory);
also when explaining the special symmetry of art; and in his
book on the Italian travel he speaks of an ever turning key,
which may well be the formula "All is equal, all unequal ..."

But the point is very much that there is no universal mathematical
grammar. Real working mathematics in reality passes between several formal
theories, each having its own formal language.

So we have reached an agreement. There is no universal
mathematical grammar, and Einstein's dream of a physics
based solely on mathematical numbers such as 1, 2, pi, e,
won't come true either: mathematics is based on the formula
a equals a, while language and physics belong to the real
world where Goethe rules: all is equal, all unequal. Note well
that his formula includes the basic equation of mathematics,
and so we can say that mathematics - the logic of building,
constructing, maintaining - is entangled with every part of the
world, while covering only half of the truth. Einstein must have
guessed this; he said mathematics is exact as long as we don't
apply it to problems of the real world, but no longer exact when
applied to a real world problem. This can also be seen in
language. I remember an article in The American Scientist
on the ambiguities of English words such as same, equal,
identical. These words are fuzzy, depending on the context.
Identical in a "normal" sense means very much the same,
equal in all important features; in mathematics the same word
has a different meaning, really really identical, in every aspect.
I don't see any way to get rid of such ambiguities, and assume
they belong intrinsically to language that works on many levels
at the same time. The wonder of language is that we can say
so much about the world with a limited set of some 26 letters,
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z, 10 digits, 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9, and some extra signs. This wonder is only
possible by means of ambiguity - a negative term, should
I better say polyvalency?

Regards Franz Gnaedinger

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Universal grammar
    ... One times infinite equals two times ... is a "wormhole" between mathematics ruled by the basic formula ... of accompanying neuronal network computing, ... of today, however, you can never really tame language. ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Universal grammar
    ... A footnote said that the basic formula of mathematics, ... q equals q, ... each having its own formal language. ... I don't see any way to get rid of such ambiguities, ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: JSH: When equals means equal, more logic
    ... the simple concept of letting equals mean equal, ... I realized that every logical statement just maps a truth to itself, ... Like with mathematics, for a logical statement, you just get the same ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: charged black hole metric
    ... > from A to B equals the "time" it requires to travel from B to A. ... A person who cannot do simplest mathematics or physics ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Universal grammar
    ... A footnote said that the basic formula of mathematics, ... q equals q, ... each having its own formal language. ... I don't see any way to get rid of such ambiguities, ...
    (sci.lang)