Re: etymology of name


Brian M. Scott wrote:
On 28 Oct 2006 15:14:50 -0700, Dusan Vukotic
<dusan.vukotic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<news:1162073689.926992.76190@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
in sci.lang:

Dusan Vukotic wrote:
Christopher Culver wrote:

[...]

Wow. Now that Mr Vukotic's mental illness is apparent,
if only this post could be somehow kept posted for all
to see, so that no one will in future waste time in
engaging in discussion with him.

Do you really think that Brian is so incapacitated that
he needs your help?

Are you kowtowing to your superiors all the time?

In all likelihood Christopher knows more about the subject
than I do, and it's a virtual certainty that he's had more
formal training in it.

There will always be people who take every word from the
bible literally and there will always be people who think
it is all fictitious. There will always be people who
have the impulse to turn everything they can to mockery
and sarcasam. Every member of this list is posting some
of his thinkings, expecting either positive or negative
ratings from the other participants. Positive reaction is
the best we can expect, but the negative one is also
welcome. Of course, no one likes to be ridculed or
treated in a disrespectful manner. I think there is
enough space on this forum for everyone. I would have
never said anything to Brian if he had not started to
torment me. I came here to exchange knowledge and a
possible new ideas and to learn from those who know more
than me.

No, you didn't. You've demonstrated both here and on
Cybalist that you are convinced that the experts -- who
certainly know more than you do -- are wrong. You are
certainly free to display your ignorance here: sci.lang is,
thank goodness, an unmoderated group. And those who
recognize that your notions of historical linguistics are
unscientific garbage are equally free to point this out.

I have no intention neither to infringe anybody's privacy
nor to generate any kind of undesired discussion.

Your intentions are beside the point; when you answer an
innocent question with garbage, someone is probably going to
point out that it's garbage, if only to protect the
innocent. You can minimize the risk by confining your
conversational partners to the other known loons.

You have proven that you are unable to think with your own BRIAN.
Should I have posted your letter from our private corespondence where
you showed an impressive lack of education.

What is the difference between 'data' and 'artefact'? Any avarage
highschool student would have answered this question without
difficulty. Only The Big BRAIN was a complete failure.

Remember, you were my student and it would be nice of you to respect
that fact.

Your teacher,
Dusan Vukotic

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: etymology of name
    ... Brian M. Scott wrote: ... unscientific garbage are equally free to point this out. ... innocent question with garbage, ... formal training in it." ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Torres last game?
    ... of course I meant Brian. ... So how is that Torre's fault, if 3/5ths of the rotation is garbage? ...
    (alt.sports.baseball.ny-yankees)
  • Re: Torres last game?
    ... of course I meant Brian. ... So how is that Torre's fault, if 3/5ths of the rotation is garbage? ...
    (alt.sports.baseball.ny-yankees)
  • Re: Fehler beim ... (D -> E)
    ... I rather like a customized error message from *many* years ago: ... EEG! ... GARBAGE! ... Brian ...
    (sci.lang)